The Nuts and Bolts of Layla
May. 7th, 2017 07:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I'm not sure if I ever mentioned it here, but back in March I decided to pull the trigger on an Embark DNA test ... for Layla. We were curious, what can I say? I'd thought about doing it sooner, but I always held off because we had a truly pants result from a test on our previous dog, Chango (an obvious Chow/Border Collie/something mix that the testing people interpreted as ... Pekingese). But that was many years ago, and surely, I thought, canine genotyping has improved since then! Plus Embark has really good reviews! So I stuck a cotton swab in her mouth (she bit it), swabbed it around to get a lot of saliva (she was very baffled), and sent it off.
The results came back this afternoon.
50.0% Golden Retriever
36.1% Labrador Retriever
13.9% ... Belgian Malinois
:D
For what it's worth, I think they're pretty much on track with what we'd suspected. Two thumbs up, 10/10, would rec Embark.
The results came back this afternoon.
50.0% Golden Retriever
36.1% Labrador Retriever
13.9% ... Belgian Malinois
:D
For what it's worth, I think they're pretty much on track with what we'd suspected. Two thumbs up, 10/10, would rec Embark.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-09 03:12 pm (UTC)And that's the thing, isn't it? Would we want to know if we were predisposed to certain diseases. Most conditions involve a complex stew of genes and environmental factors. The commercial tests only look at one or two genetic markers. Now that we can test, maybe the question becomes, do we have an obligation to know. (Certainly the life insurance companies would love that.) But perhaps that's best left to philosophers?