Date: 2011-05-08 07:31 pm (UTC)
danalwyn: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danalwyn
Oh, I'm around, although delayed. Seems the Comcast has interpreted my disapproval of their service as a signal to make it all break on me.

I have access to Deutsch's papers, if not the actual article, but I'm afraid that quantum computation is a field I don't truly understand except in it's most basic form (the last time I paid attention to it they were all aflutter because they had just managed to computer 3 times 5). It's a fascinating field, but for me the knowledge borders on the arcane. In more religious matters, I'm also not quite sure of the Many-World Interpretation, being like most physicists raised in the Copenhagen tradition, and like most experimentalists converting to Instrumentalism in my studies (Wikipedia attributes the core expression of instrumentalism to David Mermin: "Shut up and calculate". Only theorists really have the time to fight battles over the interpretation of quantum mechanics, battles which are all the more arcane for being currently indeterminate. So I don't know if I would have to fake religious umbrage when reading the article or not.

The field is fascinating though, and there's a lot of future in it. What there has been so far though is a lack of people who can make it accessible to the public. Hopefully this article is a step in the right direction (on that note: Dear taxpayers, please fund us. kthxbai).
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

nightdog_barks: (Default)
nightdog_barks

August 2019

S M T W T F S
     1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

What I'm Reading Now

Fiction
The Blinds, by Adam Sternbergh

Nonfiction
Fiasco: A History of Hollywood's Iconic Flops, by James Robert Parish

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 04:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios