nightdog_barks: (Sun)
nightdog_barks ([personal profile] nightdog_barks) wrote2011-06-18 02:01 pm

Saturday

Very warm, windy. Started reading Born Yesterday -- so far, very good.

In other news:

deekayw Diane Kristine Wild
Comments on my @HartHanson twitter article are either sympathetic, willfully misunderstand, or prove his point. http://bit.ly/mxccWT


Which ... pretty much rules out anyone who might have an honest disagreement with the piece. The article is here, for those who want to read, and concerns Hart Hanson's (the creator of Bones) less-than-positive encounter with the world of Twitter followers.
pwcorgigirl: (Art Deco reader)

[personal profile] pwcorgigirl 2011-06-18 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
You didn't miss a thing by giving up watching it. The season got dumber from there on out.

The guys have gone to the movies and I have accidentally broken one of our porch chairs. Corgiguy has been saying, "This thing sounds like it's breaking" when he sat on it (it's a really old chair that was cheap to begin with), but it seemed sturdy so I dismissed that alarming creaking sound as the chair legs moving on the wood floor. Then me, Miss Pegleg, sat on it after they left today and found myself half-trapped in a ruined chair with my butt on the floor and braced, unbendable leg up in the air.
pwcorgigirl: (can't stand it)

[personal profile] pwcorgigirl 2011-06-18 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You think nobody ever taught showrunners that the number one rule of creative expression is "If you have to explain it afterward, then it wasn't right the first time?" Oy indeed.

It was quite a trick getting out of that chair! :D
felis: (House watching)

[personal profile] felis 2011-06-19 09:39 am (UTC)(link)
it didn't surprise me at all that Hanson would mention David Shore in light of the critical reception the season finale of House received from many corners.

Well. He didn't. He mentioned Shore in light of the problems both House and Bones had with their renewal negotiations this year, it had nothing to do with twitter or the finale. DKW included it so she could end her article with a rather bad analogy as punch line.

And not to say the arictle isn't problematic, but the amount of stupidity and entitlement is horrific and IMO there is no chance for constructive dialogue in 140 characters, especially when there are hundreds of participants and every thoughtful answer you might give is only going to attract even more people who think they finally have a chance to vent their frustration at somebody with influence.
The way Sara Hess is doing it is perfect I think, funny and interesting behind-the-scenes bits, but without engaging too much with fans. The latter only creates an illusion of influence and stirs things up even more.